Summary

Potentials for MD simulations that are derived from machine learning are more effective when they are specific to each protein, rather than general-purpose (1). These force fields were calculated using Graph neural networks.

Figures

ProteinFF-NNP Min RMSD (Å)FF-NNP Mean RMSD (Å)FF-NNP Macro prob. (%)G-NNP Min RMSD (Å)G-NNP Mean RMSD (Å)G-NNP Macro prob. (%)
Chignolin0.30.9 ± 0.742.5 ± 0.20.21.5 ± 0.416.3 ± 0.2
Trp-cage1.13.2 ± 1.45.5 ± 0.14.05.5 ± 0.511.0 ± 0.1
BBA0.41.3 ± 0.730.0 ± 0.11.62.5 ± 0.442.9 ± 0.1
WW-domain0.41.0 ± 0.61.8 ± 0.22.74.9 ± 0.94.4 ± 0.1
Villin0.41.0 ± 0.518.6 ± 0.12.26.9 ± 1.46.9 ± 0.1
NTL90.50.9 ± 0.316.0 ± 0.12.74.7 ± 0.42.9 ± 0.1
BBL0.51.8 ± 0.64.6 ± 0.23.36.1 ± 1.317.0 ± 0.1
Protein B4.08.6 ± 2.59.9 ± 0.14.56.6 ± 0.74.8 ± 0.1
Homeodomain0.53.6 ± 3.935.0 ± 0.14.17.2 ± 0.97.1 ± 0.1
Protein G0.51.0 ± 0.41.5 ± 0.11.72.8 ± 0.46.1 ± 0.1
a3d3.48.5 ± 2.35.8 ± 0.14.17.0 ± 2.35.7 ± 0.1
λ-repressor4.96.8 ± 1.50.4 ± 0.24.67.5 ± 1.14.9 ± 0.1
Ref (1)

See also

1.
Navarro C, Majewski M, De Fabritiis G. Top-Down Machine Learning of Coarse-Grained Protein Force Fields. Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation. 2023;19(21):7518–26. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jctc.3c00638