Summary
Potentials for MD simulations that are derived from machine learning are more effective when they are specific to each protein, rather than general-purpose . These force fields were calculated using Graph neural networks.
Figures
| Protein | FF-NNP Min RMSD (Å) | FF-NNP Mean RMSD (Å) | FF-NNP Macro prob. (%) | G-NNP Min RMSD (Å) | G-NNP Mean RMSD (Å) | G-NNP Macro prob. (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chignolin | 0.3 | 0.9 ± 0.7 | 42.5 ± 0.2 | 0.2 | 1.5 ± 0.4 | 16.3 ± 0.2 |
| Trp-cage | 1.1 | 3.2 ± 1.4 | 5.5 ± 0.1 | 4.0 | 5.5 ± 0.5 | 11.0 ± 0.1 |
| BBA | 0.4 | 1.3 ± 0.7 | 30.0 ± 0.1 | 1.6 | 2.5 ± 0.4 | 42.9 ± 0.1 |
| WW-domain | 0.4 | 1.0 ± 0.6 | 1.8 ± 0.2 | 2.7 | 4.9 ± 0.9 | 4.4 ± 0.1 |
| Villin | 0.4 | 1.0 ± 0.5 | 18.6 ± 0.1 | 2.2 | 6.9 ± 1.4 | 6.9 ± 0.1 |
| NTL9 | 0.5 | 0.9 ± 0.3 | 16.0 ± 0.1 | 2.7 | 4.7 ± 0.4 | 2.9 ± 0.1 |
| BBL | 0.5 | 1.8 ± 0.6 | 4.6 ± 0.2 | 3.3 | 6.1 ± 1.3 | 17.0 ± 0.1 |
| Protein B | 4.0 | 8.6 ± 2.5 | 9.9 ± 0.1 | 4.5 | 6.6 ± 0.7 | 4.8 ± 0.1 |
| Homeodomain | 0.5 | 3.6 ± 3.9 | 35.0 ± 0.1 | 4.1 | 7.2 ± 0.9 | 7.1 ± 0.1 |
| Protein G | 0.5 | 1.0 ± 0.4 | 1.5 ± 0.1 | 1.7 | 2.8 ± 0.4 | 6.1 ± 0.1 |
| a3d | 3.4 | 8.5 ± 2.3 | 5.8 ± 0.1 | 4.1 | 7.0 ± 2.3 | 5.7 ± 0.1 |
| λ-repressor | 4.9 | 6.8 ± 1.5 | 0.4 ± 0.2 | 4.6 | 7.5 ± 1.1 | 4.9 ± 0.1 |
| Ref |